ArbiHonor 仲诚 · Legal Finance
Case Review Sign in
The Firm Overview The FirmTeamCompliance & Governance
Capital Overview Claim Acquisition & Non-Recourse FundingSingle-Case FundingPortfolio FundingJudgment & Award EnforcementLaw Firm Fee FinancingDebt Restructuring & NPL Resolution
Disputes Disputes
Track Record Track Record
Insights Insights
Funders Funders
Language 中文
The firm

We learned to enforce in China first.Then we went where the debtors are.

Beijing Zhongcheng Legal Consulting Co., Ltd. was founded in 2017, when almost no one in the mainland market would commit capital to a commercial claim and bear the loss if it failed. We did. Most funders came to China from London or New York; we went the other way, beginning with PRC files and extending to Hong Kong, Singapore and the offshore courts where assets tend to surface. On a China-connected claim, we know both ends.

Chaoyang District, Beijing, China Founded 2017 4 offices
US$ 3.84bn
Claim value handled
Since 2017
63
Matters concluded
Settled or finally decided
78%
Favourable outcome or settlement
Of concluded matters, losses included
21
Jurisdictions where we act
Seats and enforcement venues

Four principles we hold ourselves to

They govern which claims we accept and how we conduct them once accepted, and they explain why many are declined.

01
One standard, onshore and offshore

Wherever the claim sits, it goes through the same underwriting memo and the same investment committee. Geography changes the structure, never the threshold.

02
We fund; the client decides

We fund and manage the matter but never act as the client’s counsel. Save where we have acquired the claim outright, strategy remains with the client and its lawyers.

03
Enforcement before merits

We work backwards from enforcement — where the assets sit, how long recognition takes, whether there is counsel on the ground. A clean liability case against unreachable assets is declined.

04
Disclose what must be disclosed

Where a forum requires funding to be disclosed, we disclose it without being asked. We do not use structures that only work if they stay hidden.

Offices

Four offices, one committee

Each office is there for a procedural reason, not for the map: Beijing underwrites and decides, Hong Kong handles offshore structures and arbitration, Singapore covers South-East Asia, London serves our capital partners. Investment decisions are taken in one place.

39.90° / 116.40° Full office

Beijing

Headquarters · Underwriting & IC

22.32° / 114.17° Full office

Hong Kong

Offshore structuring & arbitration

1.35° / 103.82° Full office

Singapore

SE Asia & SIAC practice

51.51° / -0.13° Rep office

London

Investor relations representative office

Five points that widened what we could take on

Each marks a kind of claim we could not have funded the year before.

2017
Founded in Beijing

Founded by disputes lawyers and structured-finance practitioners to do one thing: price, fund and recover China-connected cross-border claims.

2019
First cross-border enforcement book collected

A portfolio spanning Hong Kong and Cayman was recovered — the first confirmation that the offshore route could be made to work.

2021
Hong Kong and Singapore offices open

Underwriters moved next to the principal arbitral seats, and South-East Asian mandates followed.

2023
Claim acquisition becomes the principal business

More than half of new commitments took the form of outright acquisition: the client exits at signing, and cost and risk remain with us.

2025
Onshore and offshore capital in one matter

Balance-sheet capital in China and fund capital offshore can now go into the same matter, so costs on both sides are met at once.

Investment committee

Every acquisition and every funding commitment is voted on here. Those who underwrite a claim do not approve it, by design.

The full team

Sale or funding: both begin with the file.

Either conversation begins the same way: we read the file and advise which course better serves the client.