ArbiHonor 仲诚 · Legal Finance
Case Review Sign in
The Firm Overview The FirmTeamCompliance & Governance
Capital Overview Claim Acquisition & Non-Recourse FundingSingle-Case FundingPortfolio FundingJudgment & Award EnforcementLaw Firm Fee FinancingDebt Restructuring & NPL Resolution
Disputes Disputes
Track Record Track Record
Insights Insights
Funders Funders
Language 中文
Expertise

Eight dispute types.Twenty-one places to enforce.

The figures below come from matters we have actually run, not from a target allocation. Where we have no presence on the ground, we say so at the outset rather than mid-enforcement.

By dispute type

International Arbitration 27%

CIETAC · HKIAC · SIAC · ICC · SCC

Cross-Border Commercial 19%

Contract, equity, guarantee and JV disputes

Insolvency & Restructuring 14%

Administrator claw-back and avoidance

Enforcement & Asset Recovery 13%

Recognition, veil-piercing, offshore tracing

Intellectual Property 9%

Patent infringement and trade secrets

Antitrust & Competition 7%

Abuse of dominance and cartel follow-on

Securities & Investor Claims 6%

China-concept misstatement and group claims

Construction & Energy 5%

Belt-and-Road project disputes

By enforcement jurisdiction

Mainland China CN · 41 matters handled
Hong Kong SAR HK · 28 matters handled
Singapore SG · 19 matters handled
United Kingdom GB · 17 matters handled
United States US · 15 matters handled
Australia AU · 9 matters handled
Japan JP · 8 matters handled
UAE AE · 7 matters handled
Germany DE · 6 matters handled
Cayman Islands KY · 6 matters handled
BVI VG · 5 matters handled
India IN · 5 matters handled
Switzerland CH · 4 matters handled
France FR · 4 matters handled
Netherlands NL · 3 matters handled
Canada CA · 3 matters handled
South Korea KR · 3 matters handled
Spain ES · 2 matters handled
Sweden SE · 2 matters handled
Jersey JE · 2 matters handled
Taiwan TW · 2 matters handled
Core Regular Opportunistic

Where we are strong, and where we are not

Three tiers: resident capability of our own, a standing relationship with local counsel, or neither, in which case a team is assembled for the matter and priced accordingly.

Tier 1
Core · resident capability
Mainland China 41Hong Kong SAR 28Singapore 19United Kingdom 17United States 15
5
Tier 2
Regular · standing counsel relationships
Australia 9Japan 8UAE 7Germany 6Cayman Islands 6BVI 5India 5Switzerland 4
8
Tier 3
Opportunistic · engaged per matter
France 4Netherlands 3Canada 3South Korea 3Spain 2Sweden 2Jersey 2Taiwan 2
8
By dispute type

What we look at first, type by type

International Arbitration 27% · 0 in book

CIETAC · HKIAC · SIAC · ICC · SCC

Cross-Border Commercial 19% · 1 in book

Contract, equity, guarantee and JV disputes

Insolvency & Restructuring 14% · 2 in book

Administrator claw-back and avoidance

Enforcement & Asset Recovery 13% · 1 in book

Recognition, veil-piercing, offshore tracing

Intellectual Property 9% · 1 in book

Patent infringement and trade secrets

Antitrust & Competition 7% · 1 in book

Abuse of dominance and cartel follow-on

Securities & Investor Claims 6% · 1 in book

China-concept misstatement and group claims

Construction & Energy 5% · 1 in book

Belt-and-Road project disputes

Who instructs us, and what they obtain

Corporates & Inbound Investors

Move cost and downside off the P&L, keep capital in the operating business, and still pursue the claim.

Law Firms

Monetise work in progress and expand contingency capacity without diluting partner equity.

Insolvency Practitioners

Start recovery on non-recourse capital and grow what is actually distributable to creditors.

Institutional Investors

Access legal assets through our underwriting and enforcement network for genuinely event-driven return.

Uncertain whether the assets can be reached where they sit?

That is precisely the question the initial assessment answers: without charge, and in writing within fifteen business days.